Will you talk about how the EPP member Fidesz standing against the core values of the EPP and EU?

What about Hungary Herr Weber? It is divided in 7 parts...Clockwise: Slowakia, Ukraina, Romania, Serbia, Croatia, Slovenia, Austria😜

Wien will be never your

🇩🇪 Solange die EU nicht als neutraler Vermittler an das Thema herangeht, kann sie m.E. nach nicht zur Lösung dieses Konfliktes beitragen. Mit Ihrem Besuch nur im südlichen Teil der Insel haben Sie wieder einmal bewiesen, dass Ihnen die Ideen, Interessen und Probleme der türkisch-zypriotischen Völkergruppe nach wie vor egal sind. 🇬🇧 As long as the EU doesn't approach the issue as a neutral mediator, it can not, in my opinion, contribute to the resolution of this conflict. With your visit only in the southern part of the island, you have proved once again that you still don't care about the ideas, interests and problems of the Turkish-Cypriot Side.

Eir-Exit .the EU is on life support

Equality Leo doesn't give a hoot on others. We have homeless, old age poverty, tax and fees all over, and you talk about nobody feels left out? Integration of whom? We have a split society and not an ounce of equality....

Best suggestion is to have a Leave or Stay referendum,..a Eir-Exit. https://www.facebook.com/257558294273180/posts/2464983906863930/

I am watching events with increasing alarm and despair. I have read most the 585 pages of a Transition deal with all its references and complexities. It is wholly unacceptable, and I have never been so shocked in all my life that intelligent people could even imagine that it is a ‘good deal’. If the Tories cannot deliver a proper Brexit before the next election, then a political chasm is certain, and the election will be lost to Corbyn. The Tories would be in wilderness territory. I watch politician after politician speak and it is all too clear many have not studied their subject and have little idea of world trade or tariffs. The WTO arrangement with safeguards could be easily applied and would be leaving properly thereby saving us a huge sum. Britsin pays £11bn net member fee, £3.1bn of their Vat, and their non-EU imports are tariffed to the tune of £16bn pa pushing up prices and 80% of this goes to the EU. They are losing £4-5bn pa of their fishing industry which Ter Heath gave away. There are several billion £s of pointless grants made with their own money apart from the net member fee, such as ‘set aside’ upon which savings could be made. The Treasury calculated in 2005 for Gordon Brown, that compliance with EU regulations costs UK industry 6-7% of GDP annually (http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/…/global_europe_1…) That is over £130bn pa much of which is wasted costs, yet only 12% of businesses have any direct or indirect business with the EU. The most important thing now is that the UK must not be left having to comply with the EU rulebook in future. Even if full tariffs were imposed under WTO, Sterling would adjust by 4-5% to cope immediately. Average WTO tariffs are 3-5%. They should look instead at the superb options open to them and the EU cannot prevent them if they just leave on WTO- E.g.. 1. The UK would receive £12bn pa in tariffs at the full WTO rates if they impose them on their EU imports alone and a further £13-14bn on non-EU imports. 2. They could also choose selective tariffs and impose nil tariffs on any class of imported goods they wish from all ovet the world, such as food, medicine or even car parts. 3. OR they could simply impose no tariffs on anything with no extra customs work required for EU goods and reducing it from the 111 countries with whom they already trade under WTO rules. Imagine REFUNDING their businesses, all WTO tariffs imposed by Brussels (by reduced taxes/business rates or other means) would cost about £6bn, and LESS than their net member fee. An intelligent application would leave them competitive and in a better place to negotiate excellent trade agreements across the world. There’s no £39bn divorce bill either, an amount the government have never explained or justified. They would be out of the single market and Customs Union and therefore free as an independent sovereign nation should be. People did not vote to be shackled to the EU any longer or the possibility of massive bail outs for Italy, now bust beyond belief as a result of EU policy and the Euro. The EU would be terrified if they ( Britain) leave under WTO terms because their deal as offered is designed to strip them of all competitive advantage possible. The PRIZE of leaving is huge yet so many are still unaware of the advantages it is very sad. Talk of cliff edge etc is totally wrong if an effort is made to prepare the ground, which could be done very rapidly. The Prime Minister has deliberately kept two Brexit Secretary’s in the dark about parallel negotiations she has capriciously been conducting. She lives in a parallel universe in relation to the deal she offers. She made encouraging noises about leaving the Single market and Customs Union initially and you all stood on a manifesto promising to do just that. It is essential to leave both to make a success of Brexit, yet her deal is a million miles away from doing this. She is not being truthful about the nature of this deal as it specifically does NOT deliver the referendum result. It is a deal for a Transition period only. She should have been negotiating a Withdrawal trade Agreement, which may have contained a brief transition. This proposal has a particularly devastating fault which is inexplicable and dangerous. It does not allow the British government to unilaterally withdraw from the transition period and has no fixed end date by which there must be a Trade Agreement, or automatic withdrawal under WTO, if none were agreed. The transition can be extended indefinitely without any power to stop it - Article 132 is totally unacceptable and No wonder the EU want BRITAIN to agree to it! The EU can then pass laws they must obey which are wholly against their interests, interpreted by the ECJ. Britain would have to continue funding the EU AT A RATE SET BY THE EU with NO BUDGET REBATE REQUIRED. EU law will continue to have effect as if they were a member – Article 127. But they won’t have any MEP’s or say over anything, they must obey and the ECJ continues its ruinous rule – Articles 86 & 131. Indeed, the ECJ will remain with them in many ways as it is the final court of interpretation for Mrs May’s deal – Article 174(1). Britain would have to comply with their Judgement on it, under Article 89(1). The EU would be able to continue to treat their territorial waters as their own and Britain may only be ‘consulted’ under Article 130 as to what fishing the British fishermen may do. Most of anything that is useful is contained in the non-binding political declaration and Mrs May is using text from it to try and persuade Britain she has a worthwhile deal. Matters of co-operation can easily be agreed post leaving and piece by piece. This deal is nothing but a surrender. There is no incentive on the EU to agree any form of so called ‘Free Trade’ deal with Britain and they can continue to disagree with anything they (EU)put forward, holding Britain in a ‘backstop’ customs union they control. Britain will also be forced to comply with ‘level playing field conditions’ covering tax, environment, employment, state aid and competition policy. See P311. All with no control or say. The backstop also means the UK will be fractured down the Irish sea. These provisions mean that effectively Britain are in the single market subject to swathes of public policy. There is scant democracy about the EU now, but this deal is an abrogation of responsibility to maintain and recover all their sovereignty, being the whole point of voting Brexit. There is plenty more alarming stuff, but I have said enough. There is no right in British law to give a foreign power control of this sort within a Treaty or to pass legislation which cannot be repealed by a successor Parliament. You will not find a Treaty anywhere in the world where the parties have no right to withdraw from it unilaterally. If there’s No Brexit there will be no Tory party and this deal is NOT Brexit. It is essential for Parliament to vote May’s deal down and put together a safeguarding package to protect their affected industry to leave absolutely and finally under WTO terms on March 29th 2019. They trade like this with 111 other countries around the world. 408 (62.8%) constituencies voted to LEAVE. It is still not too late to prevent this betrayal by instead leaving on WTO rules. It is the duty of their MPs to mobilise and to lobby for that. They must not be left in the position of a vassal state nor exposed by REMAINING to the enormous liabilities arising from the emerging Eurozone disaster, an EU army and fiscal union. At a cost in excess of £59 billion. No one is plastering that on the side of the any bus..